Rogers v. Gray Media Group, Inc. et al
Laura Rogers |
Gray Media Group, Inc. and Gray Television Group, Inc. |
1:2022cv00035 |
March 24, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
H Brent Brennenstuhl |
Greg N Stivers |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgemen |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 TEXT ORDER by Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl on 5/13/2022. This matter having been submitted to Chief Judge Stivers for a ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment, IT IS ORDERED the Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 5/16/2022 is REMANDED from the Court's docket pending the Court's ruling. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel, Traci Duff (KLL) |
Filing 18 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Laura Rogers. (Lowder, Thomas) |
Filing 17 ORDER by Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl on 4/21/2022 granting #13 Motion for Darius Walker, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice cc: Counsel; Darius Walker, Jr.(JWM) |
Filing 16 ORDER by Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl on 4/21/2022 granting #12 Motion for William S. Rutchow to Appear Pro Hac Vice cc: Counsel; Darius Walker(JWM) |
Filing 15 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Rule 56(d) Request to Conduct Discovery filed by Gray Media Group, Inc., Gray Television Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Wendy V. Miller) (Miller, Wendy) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION for Hearing Motion for Speedy Hearing filed by Gray Media Group, Inc., Gray Television Group, Inc.. (Miller, Wendy) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Darius Walker, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number AKYWDC-3566719. by Defendants Gray Media Group, Inc., Gray Television Group, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Miller, Wendy) |
Filing 12 MOTION for William S. Rutchow to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number AKYWDC-3566711. by Defendants Gray Media Group, Inc., Gray Television Group, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Miller, Wendy) |
Filing 11 ATTORNEY NOTICE of Deficiency to William S. Rutchow re #1 Notice of Removal,.Reason for Deficiency: motion to appear pro hac vice. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 4/20/2022. (KJA) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY NOTICE of Deficiency to Darius Walker, Jr. re #1 Notice of Removal.Reason for Deficiency: motion to appear pro hac vice. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 4/20/2022. (KJA) |
Filing 9 ORDER FOR RULE 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers (EBOC) on 4/1/2022. Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl will conduct a telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference on 5/16/2022 at 9:30 am CDT/10:30 am EDT. The Court will initiate the call. Counsel shall conduct a meeting of the parties by 4/25/2022. Counsel for the parties shall file a written joint report by 5/9/2022. See Order for specifics. cc:counsel; Darius Walker, Jr. KLL-Case Manager (JWM) Modified to edit distribution on 4/4/2022 (JWM). |
Filing 8 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff Laura Rogers (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, #2 Memorandum in Support Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, #3 Exhibit Exhibit A - Agreement, #4 Exhibit Exhibit B - Correspondence exercising option, #5 Exhibit Exhibit C - Affidavit of Laura Rogers, #6 Exhibit Exhibit D - Burke v. Fine Decision, #7 Exhibit Exhibit E - Mt. Comprehensive Health Corp. v. Gibson Decision) (Lowder, Thomas) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Hearing Motion for Speedy Hearing by Plaintiff Laura Rogers (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order Granting Motion for Speedy Hearing) (Lowder, Thomas) |
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers (EBOC) on 3/31/2022; Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), this matter is hereby referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl, for resolution of all litigation planning issues, entry of scheduling orders, consideration of amendments thereto, and resolution of all non-dispositive matters, including discovery issues. Judge Brennenstuhl is further authorized to conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel of Record; KLL (TJD) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Gray Television, Inc. for Gray Media Group, Inc., Gray Television Group, Inc.. by Gray Media Group, Inc., Gray Television Group, Inc.. (Miller, Wendy) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Gray Media Group, Inc., Gray Television Group, Inc.. (Miller, Wendy) |
Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE to Warren Circuit Court and Counsel/Parties, re #1 Notice of Removal. (DeW) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (DeW) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Warren Circuit Court, case number 22-CI-00308, filed by Gray Media Group, Inc., Gray Television Group, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AKYWDC-3550512.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Annual Report with Kentucky Secretary of State, #3 Exhibit 3 - Declaration of Gary Heichelbech, #4 Exhibit 4 - Notice of filing Notice of Removal, #5 Cover Sheet) (DeW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.