Matthews v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Mark B. Matthews |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2022cv00066 |
| June 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| H Brent Brennenstuhl |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl on 7/28/2022 granting #7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. The Commissioner shall have an extension through 8/31/2022 within which to file the electronic certified administrative record and answer to Plaintiff's complaint. cc: Counsel (SRH)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Lewis, Ameenah) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Social Security Case Assignment re #1 Complaint,. Social Security Notice due by 6/24/2022. (JM) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF SERVICE pursuant to #General Order 2021-20: The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Kentucky having consented to electronic service of process of complaints seeking judicial review pursuant to 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), this notice shall constitute acceptance of service as outlined in Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1)(A) and (C). This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official Entry. No document is attached. (JM) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl on 6/3/2022 granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is directed to file Plaintiffs complaint and to effectuate service on the Commissioner of Social Security and the United States Attorney for the Western District of Kentucky electronically by the process outlined in General Order No. 2021-20. cc: Counsel (JM)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Mark B. Matthews. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (DeW) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl. (DeW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Mark B. Matthews. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Letter to Clerk, #3 Summons TENDERED US Atty Gen, #4 Summons TENDERED SSA Commissioner, #5 Summons TENDERED US Attorney, #6 Cover Sheet) (DeW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Matthews v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mark B. Matthews | |
| Represented By: | Julie Atkins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Seth Schecter |
| Represented By: | Timothy D. Thompson |
| Represented By: | Ameenah Lewis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
