Jenkins v. Walmart, Inc. et al
| Sharon Jenkins |
| Walmart, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership |
| 1:2022cv00088 |
| July 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| H Brent Brennenstuhl |
| Greg N Stivers |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Sharon Jenkins. (Logsdon, Gary) |
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl: Scheduling Conference held on 9/13/2022. Amended Pleadings due by 3/31/2023. Daubert Motion due by 7/14/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 7/14/2023. Expert Discovery due by 6/30/2023. Expert Witness (Defendant) due by 5/31/2023. Expert Witness (Plaintiff) due by 3/31/2023. Fact Discovery due by 4/28/2023. Joinder of Parties due by 3/31/2023. Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosure due by 9/20/2022. Status Conference set for 7/6/2023 9:30 AM CDT in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl. cc:counsel (JWM)
|
|
Filing 9
AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl on 9/14/2022 granting #8 Proposed Agreed Order cc: Counsel(JWM)
|
| Filing 8 Proposed Agreed Order Agreed Protective Order by Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership, Walmart, Inc.. (Lynch, Joanne) Modified to edit event/add text on 9/13/2022 (JWM). |
| Filing 7 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership, Walmart, Inc.. (Lynch, Joanne) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER FOR RULE 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers (EBOC) on 7/29/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 9/13/2022 9:30 AM CDT in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl. Meeting of the parties due by 8/23/2022. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 9/6/2022. See order for details.cc:counsel; KLL-Case Manager (JWM)
|
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers (EBOC) on 7/27/2022; Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), this matter is hereby referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl, for resolution of all litigation planning issues, entry of scheduling orders, consideration of amendments thereto, and resolution of all non-dispositive matters, including discovery issues. Judge Brennenstuhl is further authorized to conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel of Record; KLL (TJD)
|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE to Barren Circuit Court and Counsel/Parties re: DN #1 Notice of Removal. (CDL) |
| Filing 3 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (CDL) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership and Walmart, Inc. (CDL) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership and Walmart, Inc. from Barren Circuit Court, case number 22-CI-00095, (Filing fee $402; Receipt No. AKYWDC-3623733), filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership and Walmart, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Pf Discovery Responses, #2 Exhibit 2 - State Cour Record, #3 Cover Sheet) (CDL) |
| ANSWER with Jury Demand (Filed in Barren Circuit Court - see DN #1 -2) by Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership, and Walmart, Inc. (CDL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
