Booth v. Williams et al
| Joe Booth |
| Kevaun Williams, Midwest Transfer of Iowa LLC and Lakecorp Transit LLC |
| 1:2022cv00100 |
| August 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Greg N Stivers |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Remand by Plaintiff Joe Booth (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Basil, Scott) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Lakecorp Transit LLC. (House, Jillian) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Notice of Removal. Reason for Deficiency: Corporate Disclosure Statement. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 8/24/2022. (DeW) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE to Barren Circuit Court and Counsel of record/Parties re #1 Notice of Removal. (DeW) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (DeW) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Barren Circuit Court, case number 21-CI-00480, filed by Kevaun Williams and Lakecorp Transit LLC. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AKYWDC-3639161) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit Buyer Receipt, #3 Exhibit State Court Removal, #4 Cover Sheet) (DeW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
