Double R Farms SOKY, LLC v. The Andersons, Inc.
Double R Farms SOKY, LLC |
The Andersons, Inc. |
1:2022cv00118 |
September 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Benjamin Beaton |
H Brent Brennenstuhl |
Greg N Stivers |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 bc Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay the Case filed by The Andersons, Inc. (*NOTE - No PDF Attached. This Reply was incorporated in Response filed at DN #16 . Re-docketed by the Clerk for reporting purposes. Please see DN #16 for viewing. (DeW) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE to Motion re #6 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay the Case, #9 MOTION to Stay re #6 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay the Case filed by The Andersons, Inc.. (White, Jordan) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of withdrawal of counsel by The Andersons, Inc. (White, Jordan) |
Filing 14 ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl on 10/13/2022 granting #12 Motion for Attorney Jacob D. Bylund to Appear Pro Hac Vice. cc: Counsel (JM) |
Filing 13 TEXT ORDER: Under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), the Court refers this matter to Magistrate Judge Brennenstuhl for hearing and determining all pretrial matters, including non-dispositive motions. Judge Brennenstuhl may conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: counsel (JM) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Jacob D. Bylund to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number AKYWDC-3670806. by Defendant The Andersons, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Proposed Order) (White, Jordan) |
Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Double R Farms SOKY, LLC. (DeW) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #6 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay the Case, filed by Double R Farms SOKY, LLC. (McCain, Michael) Modified link on 10/3/2022 (DeW). |
Filing 9 MOTION to Stay by Plaintiff Double R Farms SOKY, LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 R 7.1 Disclosure) (McCain, Michael) Modified docket text on 10/3/2022 (DeW). |
Filing 8 ATTORNEY NOTICE of Deficiency to Machen Picard Bihrle re Notice of Removal.Reason for Deficiency: motion to appear pro hac vice. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 10/11/2022. (KJA) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY NOTICE of Deficiency to Jacob D. Bylund re Notice of Removal.Reason for Deficiency: motion to appear pro hac vice. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 10/11/2022. (KJA) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay the Case by Defendant The Andersons, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Boyd Brooks Complaint, #2 Exhibit March 2020 Trade Rules, #3 Exhibit Second Decl. of Cliff Arfman, #4 Exhibit April 14, 2022 NGFA Letter, #5 Exhibit July 26, 2022 NGFA Letter, #6 Proposed Order) (White, Jordan) |
Filing 5 TEXT ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers (EBOC) on 9/8/2022. Pursuant to 28 USC 455, the Court concludes that recusal in this case is required. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is reassigned to the docket of Judge Benjamin Beaton for all further proceedings and disposition, pursuant to General Order 2022-06. Counsel are instructed to change the civil action number to reflect the initials (BJB) in place and instead of the initials (GNS) on all further pleadings. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel of Record; Case Manager Judge Beaton(TJD) |
Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE to Logan Circuit Court and Counsel/Parties re: DN #1 Notice of Removal. (CDL) |
Filing 3 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (CDL) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Other Affiliate BlackRock Inc. for The Andersons, Inc. (CDL) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (No Answer Filed) by The Andersons, Inc. from Logan Circuit Court, case number 22-CI-00216, (Filing fee $402; Receipt No. AKYWDC-3653916), filed by The Andersons, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Arbitration Demand, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - State Court Summons, #4 Exhibit D - Filing Information, #5 Exhibit E - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #6 Exhibit F - State Court Record, #7 Cover Sheet) (CDL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Double R Farms SOKY, LLC v. The Andersons, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Double R Farms SOKY, LLC | |
Represented By: | Michael W. McCain, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The Andersons, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Donald J. Kelly |
Represented By: | Jacob D. Bylund |
Represented By: | Jordan M. White |
Represented By: | Machen Picard Bihrle |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.