Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Terri Lynn Taylor
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2022cv00161
Filed: December 5, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Lanny King
Referring Judge: Greg N Stivers
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2022 Filing 9 CASE REASSIGNED to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers pursuant to General Order No. 2019-11.(cc:counsel, Judge Stivers CM) (MHB)
December 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Lanny King on 12/14/2022 granting #7 Motion for David F. Chermol to Appear Pro Hac Vice. cc: Counsel(MNM)
December 10, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for David F. Chermol to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number AKYWDC-3711753. by Plaintiff Terri Lynn Taylor (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Certificate of Good Standing) (Chermol, David)
December 8, 2022 Filing 6 Notice of Social Security Case Assignment re #1 Complaint. Social Security Notice due by 12/29/2022. (MNM)
December 8, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF SERVICE pursuant to #General Order 2021-20: The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Kentucky having consented to electronic service of process of complaints seeking judicial review pursuant to 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), this notice shall constitute acceptance of service as outlined in Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1)(A) and (C). This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official Entry. No document is attached. (MNM)
December 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Lanny King on 12/7/2022 granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3), the Clerk of Court is appointed to effectuate service on the Commissioner of Social Security and the United States Attorney for the Western District of Kentucky electronically by following the process outlined in General Order No. 21-20. cc: Counsel(MNM)
December 6, 2022 Filing 3 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Lanny King. (CDL)
December 5, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Terri Lynn Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (CDL)
December 5, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Terri Lynn Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (CDL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terri Lynn Taylor
Represented By: David F. Chermol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Benjamin Seth Schecter
Represented By: Timothy D. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?