Hamilton v. Tompkinsville Drugs, LLC et al
| Ashley Hamilton |
| Tompkinsville Drugs, LLC, Johnie Nixon and Jill Nixon |
| 1:2023cv00066 |
| May 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Greg N Stivers |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER Signed by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 7/14/2023 granting #11 Proposed Agreed Order. Plaintiff shall have up to and including 7/21/2023, in which to file a response to Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss DN #7 . The parties further agreed that Defendants shall have up to and including 8/11/2023, to file any reply to Plaintiff's response to Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss. cc: Counsel (DeW)
|
|
Filing 11
Proposed Agreed Order Requesting Second Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants' MTD (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order granting request for second extension of time to respond to Defendants MTD) by Ashley Hamilton. (Miller, Charles)
|
|
Filing 10
TEXT ORDER signed by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 6/27/2023 granting #9 Proposed Agreed Order. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have up to and including July 14, 2023, in which to file a response to Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss filed of record in the above captioned action [Doc. 7] on June 8, 2023. The parties further agreed that Defendants shall haveup to and including August 11, 2023, to file any reply to Plaintiff's response to Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel of Record (TJD)
|
|
Filing 9
Proposed Agreed Order Extending response and reply deadlines for Defendants' Partial MTD [Doc. 7] (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order granting Agreed Order of Parties to extend deadlines for response and reply related to Defendants' Partial MTD) by Ashley Hamilton. (Miller, Charles)
|
|
Filing 8
Corporate Disclosure Statement (pursuant to Rule 7.1(a)(1)) by Jill Nixon, Johnie Nixon, Tompkinsville Drugs, LLC. (Ellison, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants Jill Nixon, Johnie Nixon, Tompkinsville Drugs, LLC (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Order) (Ellison, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ashley Hamilton. Jill Nixon served on 5/23/2023, answer due 6/13/2023. (Miller, Charles)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ashley Hamilton. Johnie Nixon served on 5/23/2023, answer due 6/13/2023. (Miller, Charles)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ashley Hamilton. Tompkinsville Drugs, LLC served on 5/23/2023, answer due 6/13/2023. (Miller, Charles)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Jill Nixon, Johnie Nixon, Tompkinsville Drugs, LLC. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (CDL)
|
|
Filing 2
Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (CDL)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND against Jill Nixon, Johnie Nixon, Tompkinsville Drugs, LLC, (Filing fee $402, receipt number AKYWDC-3809887), filed by Ashley Hamilton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Right to Sue, #2 Summons Tendered) (CDL) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/18/2023: #3 Cover Sheet) (CDL).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
