Wynn v. Russellville Rural Police Dept et al
| Patrick Jay Wynn |
| Russellville Rural Police Dept, Seth Whittaker, Chase McCoy and Logan County Circuit Court |
| 1:2023cv00087 |
| July 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Joseph H McKinley |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
Letter from by Patrick Jay Wynn. Mailed a copy of docket sheet this date. (DJT)
|
|
Schedules Initial Review due by 11/14/2023. (EAS)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE (EBOC) signed by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 7/7/23; granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. cc: Plaintiff(pro se), Finance, LCDC (DJT)
|
|
Filing 4
Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr.. (DJT)
|
|
Filing 3
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Patrick Jay Wynn. (DJT)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Patrick Jay Wynn (DJT)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Logan County Circuit Court, Chase McCoy, Russellville Rural Police Dept, Seth Whittaker, filed by Patrick Jay Wynn. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Envelope) (DJT)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
