Sharp v. The Bowling Green Kentucky Police Department et al
Robert Andrew Sharp, Jr. |
The Bowling Green Kentucky Police Department, Stephen Irwin and Joshua Hughes |
1:2023cv00174 |
December 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Greg N Stivers |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robert Andrew Sharp, Jr., The Bowling Green Kentucky Police Department served on 2/16/2024, answer due 3/8/2024. (KDY) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robert Andrew Sharp, Jr., Stephen Irwin served on 2/16/2024, answer due 3/8/2024. (KDY) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robert Andrew Sharp, Jr., Joshua Hughes served on 2/16/2024, answer due 3/8/2024. (KDY) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to The Bowling Green Kentucky Police Department, Stephen Irwin, Joshua Hughes. Summonses issued and returned over the counter. Plaintiff is responsible for serving the issued summonses. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued - Irwin, #2 Summons Issued - Hughes) (KDY) |
Filing 3 NOTICE ON SUMMONS re #1 Complaint. (KDY) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (KDY) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Robert Andrew Sharp against The Bowling Green Kentucky Police Department, Stephen Irwin and Joshua Hughes. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number: 300006194. (KDY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.