Maddox v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Teresa Marie Maddox
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2024cv00031
Filed: February 13, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Lanny King
Referring Judge: Greg N Stivers
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SOCIAL SECURITY ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 4/12/2024. (See Order for details). (Attachments: #1 Fact and Law Summary Form)cc: Counsel of Record (TJD)
April 12, 2024 Filing 8 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD received from Social Security. Social Security Submission due by 6/25/2024. by Commissioner of Social Security. (Ridgell-Boltz, Laura)
March 6, 2024 Filing 7 Case REASSIGNED to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers pursuant to General Order No. 2023-02. (cc:counsel, Judge Stivers CM) (MHB)
February 14, 2024 Filing 6 Notice of Social Security Case Assignment re #1 Complaint. Social Security Notice due by 3/6/2024. (MNM)
February 14, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE OF SERVICE: Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and #General Order 2023-2:, the Court hereby notifies the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and the United States Attorney's Office for the Western District of Kentucky that a Complaint seeking judicial review has been filed. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the official notification referenced in Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions. The plaintiff does not need to serve separately a summons and complaint under Civil Rule 4. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official Entry. No Document is attached. (MNM)
February 14, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Lanny King on 2/14/2024 granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court is appointed to effectuate service on the Commissioner of Social Security and the United States Attorney for the Western District of Kentucky electronically by following the process outlined in General Order No. 21-20. cc: Counsel(MNM)
February 13, 2024 Filing 3 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Lanny King. (HMC)
February 13, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Teresa Marie Maddox. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (HMC)
February 13, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Teresa Marie Maddox against Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeal Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (HMC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maddox v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Teresa Marie Maddox
Represented By: Julie Atkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Benjamin Seth Schecter
Represented By: Timothy D. Thompson
Represented By: Laura Ridgell-Boltz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?