Briggs v. Story et al
| Larry Briggs |
| Charles Story and Peek Trucking, LLC |
| 1:2024cv00057 |
| April 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Greg N Stivers |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE to Simpson Circuit Court and Counsel of Record/Parties re #1 Notice of Removal. (HMC) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Notice of Removal. Reason for Deficiency: No Rule 7.1(a)(2) Diversity Disclosure Statement. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 4/18/2024. (HMC) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement (pursuant to Rule 7.1(a)(1)) identifying Other Affiliate Charles Story for Peek Trucking, LLC. (HMC) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (HMC) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Charles Story, Peek Trucking, LLC from Simpson Circuit Court, case number 23-CI-00248. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AKYWDC-4008127) (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Filings, #3 Exhibit C - Notice to Plaintiff's Counsel) (HMC) |
| ANSWER to Complaint filed in Simpson Circuit Court (see DN #1 -2) by Peek Trucking, LLC, Charles Story. (HMC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
