Long v. Hernandez et al
Lionel Long |
Agent Carlos Hernandez and Office of Chief Counsel |
1:2024cv00124 |
October 18, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Greg N Stivers |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 nr Notice of Removal |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE OF REMOVAL LETTER sent to Casey Circuit Court re #1 Notice of Removal. (DJT) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (DJT) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL [NO ANSWER FILED] by Office of Chief Counsel, Carlos Hernandez from Casey Circuit Court, case number 24-CI-00141. () Notice to counsel: Pursuant to LR 81.1(a), the removing party must electronically file any portion of the state court record it considers relevant to the removed action that the removing party did not file at the time of removal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1446(a). Pursuant to LR 81.1(b), any motion that remains pending in state court at the time of removal that the movant wishes the District Court to rule upon must be refiled in the District Court case within 14 days after removal., filed by Office of Chief Counsel, Carlos Hernandez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Motion to Compel, #3 Exhibit 3 - Order, #4 Exhibit 4 - Motion for Sanctions) (DJT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.