USA v. Peck
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Bruce G. Peck
Case Number: 3:1996cv00796
Filed: December 6, 1996
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Louisville Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. Russell
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 7402
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 60 OPINION & ORDER granting 44 Motion to Withdraw; withdrawing 31 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 40 Motion to Dismiss; denying 41 Motion for TRO; denying 42 Motion to Stop Withholding Benefits; denying 55 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas B. Russell on 06/18/2009. cc: counsel,defendant (CSD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: USA v. Peck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Charles H. Keen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bruce G. Peck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?