Baar v. Jefferson County Public Schools et al
| 3:2006cv00075 |
| February 9, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| John G. Heyburn |
| Dave Whalin |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
168
MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 5/12/2010. The Court will issue an Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion. cc: Counsel (AEP)
|
|
Filing
157
REVISED AND FINAL MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 2/19/2010; the court will issue an order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion.cc:counsel (via fax & mail to Atty. Daniel Taylor) (TLB)
|
|
Filing
149
MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 10/27/2009 re 135 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants. Court will issue an order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion. cc: Counsel (RLK)
|
|
Filing
117
MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by Chief Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 2/8/2008. The Court will enter an order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion. cc: Counsel (Taylor via fax) (RLK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Baar v. Jefferson County Public Schools et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
