Westfield Insurance Company v. Radcliff Automotive, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Westfield Insurance Company
Defendant: Radcliff Automotive, LLC and Michael Lee Bernard
Counter Claimant: Radcliff Automotive, LLC and Michael Lee Bernard
Counter Defendant: Westfield Insurance Company
Case Number: 3:2007cv00086
Filed: February 20, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Louisville Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Charles R. Simpson
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 63 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 6/8/2009; 54 motion to alter judgment DENIED; 56 motion to dismiss bad faith claims GRANTED; defendants' claims DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. cc:counsel (TLB)
March 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 3/27/2009. For the reasons set forth, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 26 will be denied, and Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment 42 will be granted. A separate order will be entered in accordance with this Opinion.cc: Counsel (RLK) Modified on 3/30/2009: create links (RLK).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Westfield Insurance Company v. Radcliff Automotive, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Westfield Insurance Company
Represented By: Walter Edsel Wilson, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Radcliff Automotive, LLC
Represented By: C. Gilmore Dutton, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Lee Bernard
Represented By: C. Gilmore Dutton, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Radcliff Automotive, LLC
Represented By: C. Gilmore Dutton, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Michael Lee Bernard
Represented By: C. Gilmore Dutton, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: Westfield Insurance Company
Represented By: Walter Edsel Wilson, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?