Ventas, Inc. v. HCP, Inc.
| Ventas, Inc. |
| Health Care Property Investors, Inc. |
| 3:2007cv00238 |
| May 3, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Jefferson |
| John G. Heyburn |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
558
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 8/18/2011; Ventas is entitled to judgment on the mandate of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in the amount of $101,672,807.00, plus interest. The issue concerning the Letter of Credit remains under the Court's consideration.cc:counsel (TLB)
|
|
Filing
520
MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 11/16/2009. The Court will issue an Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion. cc: Counsel (AEP)
|
|
Filing
450
MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 9/4/2009. Parties debate the proper jury instruction on the elements of tortious interference with prospective business relations. For the reasons set forth, Court has instructed the jury in accordance with this Memorandum Opinion and more specifically as set forth in the attached instructions.cc: Counsel (RLK)
|
|
Filing
442
Jury Instructions. (TLB)
|
|
Filing
379
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 8/27/2009. For the reasons set forth, the exchange rate for determining damages is calculated on the date Sunrise's unitholders approved Ventas's acquisition.cc: Counsel (RLK)
|
|
Filing
220
MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 7/15/2009, 175 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by HCP, Inc., and 177 MOTION For Partial Summary Judgment And For Relief Under Rule 16 filed by Ventas, Inc. Court will enter an order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion.cc: Counsel (RLK)
|
|
Filing
207
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 6/24/09; parties may re-open two previously taken depos each; parties be guided by the instructions as articulated in this Memo Opinion re:testimony, objections and instructions not to answer.cc:counsel (MLG)
|
|
Filing
186
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 5/26/2009. For the reasons set forth, 156 Defendant HCP's Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Counterclaim is DENIED. cc: Counsel (RLK)
|
|
Filing
154
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER sustaining 136 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings signed by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 3/24/09. HCP's counterclaims against Ventas are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. cc:counsel (NM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ventas, Inc. v. HCP, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Health Care Property Investors, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ventas, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Holland N. McTyeire, V |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
