Teague v. Light et al
| Ja-Ron Shawn Teague |
| Light and Zellar |
| 3:2008cv00182 |
| August 18, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Jefferson |
| John G. Heyburn |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 3/23/2010; for the reasons set forth in 71 Memorandum Opinion, Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED. This is a final Order. The Court further certifies that an appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith.cc:Plaintiff Teague, pro se (SC)
|
|
Filing
37
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 1/12/09; GRANTING 24 Motion to Reopen. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to reopen this action and to restore it to the Court's active docket. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a fully completed amen ded complaint with the Court within 20 days. Plaintiff WARNED that failure to fully comply will RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION. The Clerk of Court DIRECTED to affix the instant case number on a 1983 form and send it to Plaintiff. Show Cause Response due by 2/3/2009. cc:Plaintiff, pro se, Defendants (SC)
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Chief Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 9/23/08; Court to enter separate Order in accordance with this opinion.cc:Plaintiff, pro se, Defendants (SC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
