Ward v. Exxon Mobile Corporation
Plaintiff: Stephen Ward
Defendant: Exxon Mobile Corporation
Case Number: 3:2008cv00358
Filed: July 9, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: P.I.: Other Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Charles R. Simpson
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Judge Charles R. Simpson III on 10/6/08 re 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Exxon Mobile Corporation. Motion to be granted by separate order. cc:counsel (NM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ward v. Exxon Mobile Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephen Ward
Represented By: Philip C. Kimball
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Exxon Mobile Corporation
Represented By: Glenn V. Whitaker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?