Madison Capital Company, LLC v. Smith et al
| Madison Capital Company, LLC |
| Connie Smith, Timothy P. Smith and American Mining & Manufacturing Corporation |
| 3:2008cv00382 |
| July 21, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Oldham |
| John G. Heyburn |
| Defendant |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 11/17/2009. Defendants' motions to vacate or alter the judgment 60 , enter a separate judgment 61 , and make the judgment interlocutory 63 are all DENIED. Having denied these motions, there is no just cause to delay the writ of execution and garnishment applications. The Court Clerk will be directed to enter them. cc: Counsel (RLK)
|
|
Filing
53
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 3/4/2009. After issuing its Memorandum Opinion 52 , the Court also discussed its contents and the scope of the appropriate relief. This amended Memorandum Opinion is modified only slightly from the original. Court will enter an order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion. cc: Counsel (RLK)
|
|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 2/24/2009. The Court will enter an Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion. cc: Counsel (RLK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
