Wade v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC
Jamie Wade |
Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC |
3:2008cv00479 |
September 8, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Consumer Credit Office |
Marion |
Charles R. Simpson |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 8/24/2010; re 22 MOTION to Amend/Correct Answer filed by Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC. For the reasons set forth, Motion to Amend will be granted by separate Order. cc:counsel (RLK) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wade v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jamie Wade | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.