Gant v. Office For The Blind
Plaintiff: Duwayne L. Gant
Defendant: Office For The Blind
Case Number: 3:2008cv00594
Filed: November 13, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Joseph H. McKinley
Presiding Judge: Dave Whalin
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 21 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. It is GRANTED with respect to the dismissal of Beth Smith; it is DENIED as to all other claims. Signed by Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 5/1/09. cc:counsel (JBM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gant v. Office For The Blind
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Duwayne L. Gant
Represented By: Sharon Krevor-Weisbaum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Office For The Blind
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?