Highview Engineering, Inc. et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
| Highview Engineering, Inc. and Darroll L. Hawkins |
| United States Army Corps of Engineers and Ann D. Nunn |
| 3:2008cv00647 |
| December 10, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Jefferson |
| Charles R. Simpson |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 05:0701 Maritime Subsidy Board |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III re 49 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Highview Engineering, Inc., Darroll L. Hawkins and 48 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by United States Army Corps of Engineers cc:counsel (MLG)
|
|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 7/23/2010 re 21 MOTION to Dismiss. What remains of the motion to dismiss will be denied by separate order. cc: Counsel (AEP)
|
|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 5/21/2010. For the reasons set forth, the Court will deny the Motion to Strike; dismiss Counts I (in part), II, III, and IV; and order Plaintiffs to respond to the Motion to Dismiss with respect to part of Count 1. Because there is no need for discovery at this point, the Plaintiffs' request for Rule 56(f) relief will be denied. cc: Counsel (RLK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
