Thornton v. Western & Southern Financial Group Beneflex Plan et al
Scott Thornton |
Western & Southern Financial Group Beneflex Plan, Western & Southern Financial Group Benefits Committee, Western & Southern Financial Group, Inc. and The Western & Southern Life Insurance Company |
3:2008cv00648 |
December 10, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office |
Jefferson |
Joseph H. McKinley |
James D. Moyer |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants motion for summary judgment 36 is granted in part and denied in part. Summary judgment is granted as to Counts I, II, and III. Summary judgment is denied as to Count IV, Appropria tion of Plaintiffs Name and Likeness. The motion by Plaintiff, Scott Thornton, for summary judgment regarding LTIR Plan Benefits 37 is denied. This matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a settlement conference on the remaining claim.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion by Defendants to strike the Plaintiffs Reply Memorandum addressing his ERISA claim 49 is denied. Signed by Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 6/22/11. cc:counsel, JDM (JBM) |
Filing 25 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Magistrate Judge James D. Moyer on 1/28/10;The Court will deny the Defendant's request for a protective order.cc:counsel (JBM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.