Gentry v. Oldham County Kentucky
Plaintiff: Bruce Gentry
Defendant: Oldham County Kentucky
Case Number: 3:2008cv00676
Filed: December 30, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Shelby
Presiding Judge: James D. Moyer
Presiding Judge: Charles R. Simpson
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 76 Jury Instructions. (RLK)
January 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 72 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 1/21/2011. For the reasons set forth, 57 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. cc: Counsel (RLK)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gentry v. Oldham County Kentucky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bruce Gentry
Represented By: William T. Donnell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oldham County Kentucky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?