Dawan v. State of Kentucky
Plaintiff: Yusuf Mujahid Dawan
Defendant: State of Kentucky
Case Number: 3:2009cv00034
Filed: January 14, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Civil Rights (Prison Condition) Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Charles R. Simpson
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 6/1/09; for the reasons set forth in DN 10 Memorandum and Opinion, the instant action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Court certifies that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. This is a Final Order.cc:Plaintiff, pro se, Defendant (SC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dawan v. State of Kentucky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yusuf Mujahid Dawan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Kentucky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?