Euro Dismantling Services Limited v. Newbridge Development LLC et al
| Euro Dismantling Services Limited |
| Newbridge Development LLC, The Mardrian Group, Inc. and Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Department of Inspections, Permits, Licenses |
| 3:2009cv00057 |
| January 29, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Jefferson |
| Charles R. Simpson |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
OPINION AND ORDER signed by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 10/28/2010, re 28 Motion to Reconsider. Order entered on 3/29/2010 is AMENDED as set forth. Failure to comply within the time allowed will provide grounds for sanctions. Upon the filing of the Indemnity Agreement, the action will be dismissed by further Order. All other provisions of the Order entered on 3/29/2010 remain in full force and effect. cc: Counsel (RLK)
|
|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 3/26/2010. For the reasons set forth, the Court will deny Plaintiff's MOTION to Dismiss 17 , and grant Defendant's MOTION to Enforce Settlement 19 and order specific performance of the insurance provision of the settlement agreement. The Court will deny the parties' Motions for Sanctions. The Court will enter a separate order consistent with this Opinion. cc: Counsel (RLK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
