Parrish v. Simpson
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 29, 2016
MEMORANDUM OF CONFERENCE AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale. A teleconference having been conducted and the Court being otherwise sufficiently advised, it is ORDERED that the portion of this Court's Memorandum and Order to Stay and Hold in Abeyanc e (D.N. 100) requiring Petitioner to file status reports on the state proceedings every 90 days is SUSPENDED. However, the portion of the Court's Order (D.N. 100) requiring Petitioner to notify this Court no later than 21 days after exhausting h is state-court remedies remains in effect. A telephonic status conference is SET for July 11, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. The Court will initiate the call. Participating counsel shall contact Judge Hale's Case Manager, Natalie Thompson by July 6, 2016. cc: Counsel (SG)
|March 21, 2012
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 3/20/12 denying 58 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 59 Motion for Reconsideration. Matters of state-court record and discovery in this Court having been determined, the way is clear for this Court to turn its attention to the merits of Petitioners petition cc:counsel (DAK)
|February 26, 2010
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 2/25/2010. For the reasons set forth, 19 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with respect to claim two of the petition, and is DENIED with respect to the remaining claims. By separate Order, the Court will schedule a telephonic conference to discuss scheduling issues related to the remaining claims. cc: Counsel (AEP)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?