Best v. Best Buy, Inc
Plaintiff: David Michael Best
Defendant: Best Buy, Inc
Case Number: 3:2009cv00280
Filed: April 13, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Hardin
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. Russell
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 40 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 11/16/2009 DISMISSING Case With Prejudice. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is SUSTAINED. This is a final order. cc: Counsel; Plaintiff, pro se (AEP) Modified on 11/17/2009: language re motion (RLK).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Best v. Best Buy, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Michael Best
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Best Buy, Inc
Represented By: Richard S. Cleary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?