Clayton v. United States Army
Plaintiff: Charles Clayton
Defendant: United States Army
Case Number: 3:2009cv00295
Filed: April 22, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Louisville Office
County: Hardin
Presiding Judge: Charles R. Simpson
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 11/19/09; for the reasons set forth in 7 Memorandum Opinion, the instant petition for writ of mandamus is DISMISSED. All other pending motions are DENIED as moot. This is a final order. The Court certifies that an appeal in forma pauperis would not be taken in good faith. cc:Petitioner, pro se, Respondent (SC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clayton v. United States Army
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles Clayton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Army
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?