Ward v. Kentucky State Reformatory et al
| David Allen Ward |
| Kentucky State Reformatory, Larry Chandler, John Wright, Mark Geddes, Lawrence Duvall, Mashell McMillian, Kemen, Haas, LaDonna H. Thompson and Health Care Grievance Committee |
| 3:2009cv00315 |
| May 4, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Jefferson |
| John G. Heyburn |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
153
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 6/15/2011; for the reasons set forth, 130 Motion for Summary Judgment, 131 Motion for Summary Judgment, 132 Motion for Summary Judgment are GRANTED; by separate order the court will direct the clerk to enter summary judgment in favor of defendants; all remaining pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. cc:plaintiff pro se, counsel (TLB)
|
|
Filing
103
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn,II on 10/29/2010; DENYING 99 Motion for Reconsideration to resubmit sick call slips; DENYING 100 Motion seeking assistance in locating Michelle Krumm McMillian; DENYING 101 Motion For Appointment of Guardian ; DENYING 102 Motion to Appoint Counsel.cc:Plaintiff Ward, pro se, Counsel (SC)
|
|
Filing
95
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 9/21/2010; DENYING 70 Motion for Leave to; DENYING 71 Motion ; GRANTING 72 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff shall have an additional 60 days to provide a current address for McMi llian. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of the action against Defendant McMillan ; DENYING 74 Motion ; DENYING 75 Second Motion to Inform The Court. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a blank motion form ; DENYING 76 M otion ; GRANTING 77 Motion For Explation. Counsel shall certify that the production is complete and shall file the certification with the Court no later than December 15, 2010 ; DENYING 78 Motion to Amend Discovery; DENYING 79 Motion ; DENYING as moot 80 Motion to Dismiss ; DENYING 81 Motion ; DENYING in part as to his requests regarding sick call slips and GRANTING in part 82 Motion as to extension of time for discovery deadline. The Court will issue a Second Revised Scheduling Order; DEN YING 83 Motion ; DENYING 84 Motion ; DENYING 85 Motion ; DENYING 86 Motion ; DENYING 87 Motion ; DENYING 88 Motion. Upon review, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Objection to medical records produced by Defendants (DN 94) is DENIED. cc:Plaintiff Ward, pro se, Counsel (SC)
|
|
Filing
92
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 9/7/2010; 63 motion for leave to file answer out of time GRANTED; 65 motion to submit statements and records GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; 66 motion to submit grievance forms an d sick call forms GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; Exhibits C and D STRICKEN from the record; clerk directed to return exhibits C and D to plaintiff; clerk directed to return sick call slips to plaintiff via certified mail; re 73 motion to point out mistakes in plaintiff's medical records; court will construe motion as a response to medical records produced by defendants; therefore motion is GRANTED.cc: plaintiff Ward pro se, counsel of record (TLB)
|
|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 1/25/2010 re: motions filed by the Plaintiff. For the reasons set forth, 24 Motion Asking Court Not To Dismiss Civil Suit Against Aramark is DENIED and 23 Motion to Amend Relief is GRANTED. cc: Counsel; Plaintiff, pro se (AEP)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 7/24/09; for the reasons set forth in 16 Memorandum & Opinion, the Plaintiff's 1983 claim against Aramark and his 1983 individual and official-capacity claims against Defendants Mark Geddes and Mashell McM illian are DISMISSED. Only Plaintiff's state-law claims are permitted to proceed against these Defendants. Further, the 1983 individual-capacity claims against Defendant Healthcare Grievance Committee members are DISMISSED. Because no claims remain against Defendant Healthcare Grievance Committee, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate this Defendant from this action. cc:Plaintiff Ward, pro se, Defendants, General Counsel, Justice & Public Safety Cabinet (SC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
