Brown v. Correct Care Integrated Health et al
Curtis L. Brown |
Correct Care Integrated Health, Steve Haney, Shelli Votaw, Datha Belcher, Dolly Hamlin and Vicki Brockman |
3:2009cv00990 |
December 23, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Louisville Office |
Oldham |
Charles R. Simpson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 ORDER by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 5/23/2011; for the reasons set forth in 48 Memorandum and Opinion, Defendants' motions to dismiss (DNs 40 , {41], 42 , and 45 are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED. This is a final Order. The Court further certifies that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.cc:Plaintiff, pro se, Counsel (SC) |
Filing 39 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 2/8/2011; the Court makes the determination that the Defendants have wholly failed to meet their burden in this case. For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' moti ons to dismiss (DNs) 16 , 20 , 27 , and 32 are DENIED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 30 days of the entry of this Order, Defendants shall file a renewed motion to dismiss if they intend to rely on the affirmative defense of exhaustion. Plain tiff shall have 30 days of the date contained on Defendant's certificate of service. Defendants may file a reply within 15 days of the date in Plaintiff's certificate of service; DN 11 is DENIED; DN 15 GRANTED; DN 22 DENIED; (DNs)[24 ] AND 25 are GRANTED; DN 29 GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Discovery is stayed except discovery related to the issue of exhaustion of administrative remedies. Defendant Belcher filed a motion DN 32 , having received no objection, the motion is GRANTED and the attached motion to dismiss is deemed filed as of this date.cc:Plaintiff, pro se, Counsel (SC) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 3/26/2010; the court will allow plaintiff's individual-capacity claims to proceed against defendants; a separate scheduling order will be entered; plaintiff's official- capaci ty claims against defendants are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 USC 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and pursuant to 28 USC 1915A(b)(2) for seeking monetary relief from defendants who are immune from such relief.cc: plaintiff pro se, General Counsel, Counsel of Record, Defendants (TLB) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.