Turner v. Ford Motor Company UAW Retirement Plan et al
Eugene N. Turner |
Ford Motor Company UAW Retirement Plan, Hilda Solis, Timothy Geithner and Eric H. Holder, Jr. |
3:2010cv00221 |
April 6, 2010 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Louisville Office |
Nelson |
Joseph H McKinley |
James D Moyer |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants against Eugene N. Turner. The Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice.cc:counsel (JBM) |
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting #12 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court dismisses the remaining Defendants as well. A judgment will entered consistent with this Opinion. Signed by Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 7/19/10. cc:counsel (JBM) |
Filing 15 REPLY to Response to Motion re #12 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Ford Motor Company UAW Retirement Plan. (Turner, Michelle) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE to Motion re #12 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Eugene N. Turner. Replies due by 6/24/2010. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Stewart, John) |
Filing 13 AMENDED ANSWER to #1 Complaint, #6 Amended Complaint by Ford Motor Company UAW Retirement Plan. (Turner, Michelle) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendant Ford Motor Company UAW Retirement Plan Responses due by 6/11/2010 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Affidavit Affidavit of Keith M. Murray, #3 Proposed Order) (Turner, Michelle) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to #6 Amended Complaint, #1 Complaint,, ANSWER to #6 Amended Complaint, #1 Complaint, by Ford Motor Company UAW Retirement Plan. (Turner, Michelle) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eugene N. Turner. Eric H. Holder, Jr served on 4/16/2010, answer due 5/7/2010. (Stewart, John) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eugene N. Turner. Timothy Geithner served on 4/12/2010, answer due 5/3/2010. (Stewart, John) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eugene N. Turner. Hilda Solis served on 4/13/2010, answer due 5/4/2010. (Stewart, John) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eugene N. Turner. Ford Motor Company UAW Retirement Plan served on 4/12/2010, answer due 5/3/2010. (Stewart, John) |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Ford Motor Company UAW Retirement Plan, Timothy Geithner, Eric H. Holder, Jr, Hilda Solis, filed by Eugene N. Turner. (Attachments: #1 Verification of Eugene Turner) (JBM) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Corrected Complaint Title Page & Verification by Eugene N. Turner re #1 Complaint, (Attachments: #1 Corrected Complaint Title, #2 Verification of Eugene Turner) (Stewart, John) |
Filing 4 ORDER [EBOC] by Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 4/7/10; Referring Case to Magistrate Judge James D. Moyer for determination of nondispositive matters.cc:counsel (PRM) |
Filing 3 Summonses Issued and mailed to counsel to effect service as to Ford Motor Company UAW Retirement Plan, Timothy Geithner, Eric H. Holder, Jr, and Hilda Solis. (RLK) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Joseph H. McKinley, Jr.. (PRM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ford Motor Company UAW Retirement Plan, Timothy Geithner, Eric H. Holder, Jr, Hilda Solis Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 0644-1034419, filed by Eugene N. Turner. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons for Timothy Geithner, #3 Summons for Eric Holder, #4 Summons for Hilda Solis, #5 Summons for Mickey Bartlett) (PRM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.