Pelsor v. Petoria, Inc. et al
| Charles L. Pelsor |
| Petoria, Inc., Brecharr Hemmaplardh, Edward Lother, Samuel Richardson and Great American Water Bowl Company, Inc. |
| 3:2010cv00304 |
| April 30, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Jefferson |
| Charles R. Simpson |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 11/29/2011; re 16 MOTION to Transfer Case to the Western District of North Carolina; the court concludes that the action should be transferred in the interest of justice. A separate order will be entered this date in accordance with this opinion.cc:counsel (TLB)
|
|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 4/13/2011. For the reasons set forth, 6 Great American Water Bowl Company, Inc., Brecharr Hemmaplardh, Edward Lother, Petoria, Inc., and Samuel Richardson's Motion to Dis miss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is DENIED. In addition, 5 Brecharr Hemmaplardh, Edward Lother, and Samuel Richard's Motion to Dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is DENIED with leave to refile at the conclusion of jurisdictional discovery. Plaintiff is granted ninety (90) days to conduct discovery addressed to personal jurisdiction over Defendants Brecharr Hemmaplardh, Edward Lother, and Samuel Richardson. cc: Counsel (RLK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
