Clay v. City of Louisville Metro et al
| Kendall Clay |
| City of Louisville Metro, Giles Meloche and Wayne Zelinsky |
| 3:2010cv00371 |
| May 21, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Jefferson |
| Charles R. Simpson |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
122
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 7/31/2012; re 81 MOTION for Reconsideration; 82 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment; 86 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings; 93 Fourth MOTION to Amend/Correct Verified Complaint; 94 MO TION to withhold decision on motion for partial summary judgment; 96 MOTION to substitute fourth amended complaint; 98 MOTION for Summary Judgment; 103 MOTION to Abstain and Stay; 116 MOTION for oral argument; an order consistent with this opinion will be entered this date. cc:counsel (TLB)
|
|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 12/8/2011; re 30 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint filed by Kendall Clay, 55 MOTION to Amend/Correct Third Amended Complaint filed by Kendall Clay, 58 MOTION to Amend/Correct Motion to Substitute Third Amended Complaint filed by Kendall Clay ; an order consistent with this opinion will be entered this date.cc:counsel (TLB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
