Whitlock et al v. FSL Management, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: William Whitlock, David Skyrm, James Middleton and Kristin Moore
Defendant: FSL Management, Inc., Entertainment Concepts Investors, LLC and Cordish Operating Ventures, LLC
Case Number: 3:2010cv00562
Filed: August 25, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Louisville Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Dave Whalin
Presiding Judge: Joseph H. McKinley
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 189 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 184 Motion to Decertify the Class; Final approval of the Class Action Settlement is GRANTED; granting 181 Motion for Attorney Fees and Cost. Class counselare awarded attorneys fees in the amount of $ 250,000 and litigation expenses and costs in the amount of $7,085.96. The Court approves incentive awards in the amount of $10,029 for William Whitlock and David Skyrm; $7,689 for Gary Muncy; and $6,351 for Michael Brown, Holly Goodman, and Kristin Moore.. Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 12/21/2015. cc: Counsel(JBM)
October 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 129 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 119 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 10/16/13. cc:counsel (JBM)
December 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 105 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 100 Motion to Stay; The litigation of Plaintiffs claims are hereby stayed until the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals rules on Defendants Petition for Permission to Appeal and, if granted, the resolution of Defen dants appeal. IT ISFURTHER ORDERED that the Defendants shall notify the Court of the resolution of Defendants Petition for Permission to Appeal within seven days of receipt of the decision. Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 12/21/12. cc:counsel (JBM)
August 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 96 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 71 Motion to Certify Class; Plaintiffs counsel are appointed class counsel pursuant to Rule 23(g). The class andsubclass are defined as follows: (A) All non-salaried employees of FSL Management, LLC, and FSH M anagement, LLC,who worked without receiving hourly wages from January 30, 2007, through January 1, 2010; (B) All tipped employees of FSL Management, LLC, and FSH Management, LLC, who were required to pay a portion of their tips to other employees and were required to participate in a mandatory tip pool from January 30, 2007, through January 1, 2010. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a scheduling conference to develop a class action litigation plan and address the class notification requirement pursuant to Rule 23(c)(2). Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 8/10/12. cc:counsel, AP (JBM)
July 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 95 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr denying plaintiffs 85 Motion to Remand to Jefferson Circuit Court. cc:counsel (MLG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Whitlock et al v. FSL Management, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Whitlock
Represented By: Michele Henry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Skyrm
Represented By: Michele Henry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Middleton
Represented By: Michele Henry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristin Moore
Represented By: Michele Henry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FSL Management, Inc.
Represented By: David E. Crittenden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Entertainment Concepts Investors, LLC
Represented By: David E. Crittenden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cordish Operating Ventures, LLC
Represented By: David E. Crittenden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?