Sheckles v. Ralcorp Frozen Bakery Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Stephan Sheckles
Defendant: Ralcorp Frozen Bakery Products, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2010cv00665
Filed: October 25, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Louisville Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Jennifer B. Coffman
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 6 Motion to Remand; This action is REMANDED to the Jefferson Circuit Court and is STRICKEN from the active docket. Signed by Judge Jennifer B. Coffman on 3/10/11. cc:counsel, JCC (JBM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sheckles v. Ralcorp Frozen Bakery Products, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephan Sheckles
Represented By: Michael A. Augustus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ralcorp Frozen Bakery Products, Inc.
Represented By: Oliver Barrett Rutherford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?