Wright v. Crews et al
| Earl W. Wright |
| Diamond Pharmacy Services, Cookie Crews and Faiyaz |
| 3:2011cv00026 |
| January 13, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Oldham |
| John G. Heyburn |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 5/23/12 sustaining 37 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs remaining claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.This is a final order. cc:counsel, Earl W. Wright, pro se (DAK)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 5/23/2011; for the reasons set forth herein, that Plaintiff's official-capacity claims against Cookie Crews and Dr. Faiyaz are DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's i ndividual-capacity claim against Crews and his claim against Diamond Pharmacy Services are DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate them from this action. The Court will enter a separate Scheduling Order governing the Individual-capacity claim against Dr. Faiyaz. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motions (DNS 6 , 7 , and 8 ) are DENIED. cc:Plaintiff, pro se, Defendants, General Counsel, Justice & Public Safety Cabinet (SC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
