Gifford v. Bullitt County Jail et al
| Andrew Gifford |
| Bullitt County Jail, Shockey and Plessinger |
| 3:2011cv00118 |
| February 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Oldham |
| John G. Heyburn |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 4/3/12 granting 31 Motion for Summary Judgment. By separate Order, the Court will dismiss the federal, excessive-force claim asserted against Defendants Shockey and Plessinger.cc:counsel, Plaintiff, pro se (DAK)
|
|
Filing
9
SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 4/21/2011; re 8 Memorandum & Order, the Court allowed certain claims to go forward, to govern the development of the continuing claims, IT IS ORDERED as follows: The Clerk of Court shall issue summons , and the United States Marshal shall serve a copy of the complaint and summons on Defendants. A copy of the complaint and this Order shall also be served on the Bullitt county Attorney. The parties shall complete all Pretrial Discovery due by 9/8/ 2011;All Dispositive Motions due by 11/10/2011; Defendant's Pretrial Memorandum due by 11/10/2011 and Plaintiff's due by 10/11/2011. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order of the Court MAY RESULT IN A DISMISSAL OF THIS CASE.cc:Plaintiff, pro se, Defendants, Bullitt County Attorney (SC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
