Perry et al v. Autozone Stores, Inc. et al
| Shana Perry, Damon Harper and Daryl Quiney |
| Autozone Stores, Inc., Autozone Development Corporation, Autozone Texas, L.P., Autozoners, LLC, Dawn E. Brandenburg, Donnie Helstern and Autozone, Inc. |
| 3:2011cv00403 |
| July 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Jefferson |
| John G. Heyburn |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
132
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants motion 114 and 115 for statutory remittitur is SUSTAINED and Plaintiff Perrys verdict is reduced to $450,000. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Harpers award of economic damages is reduced to $40,72 0. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants remaining motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, for a new trial, and for remittitur are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs are awarded attorneys fees in the amount of $182,258.78 and costs in the amount of $10,898.38. Signed by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 2/3/14. cc:counsel (JBM)
|
|
Filing
106
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 10/23/2013; Defendants motion for judgment as to punitive damages is SUSTAINED in part and the punitive damage claims as to Ms. Perrys wage discrimination claim, Mr. Harpers claims, and Mr. Quineys claims are DISMISSED. Defendants motion for judgment as to all other claims is DENIED.cc:counsel (DAK)
|
|
Filing
108
Jury Instructions. (DAK)
|
|
Filing
102
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 78 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 78 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 10/9/13. cc:counsel (MM)
|
|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 6/17/2013; 43 Motion for Summary Judgment; Plaintiff Perrys disparate pay claim is SUSTAINED as that claim is brought under Title VII and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; Plaintiff Perrys dis parate pay claim is DENIED as that claim is brought under the Kentucky Civil Rights Act; Plaintiff Perrys claims for quid pro quo sexual harassment and retaliatory constructive discharge is SUSTAINED and these claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; Pla intiff Perrys claim for a sexually hostile work environment and retaliatory hostile work environment is DENIED; upon reconsideration, Harpers and Quineys claim of retaliation based upon their terminations is REINSTATED. The remaining claims are (1) H arpers and Quineys claims for racial discrimination and for retaliation, each based on their terminations, and (2) Perrys claims for state law racial discrimination based on disparate pay, sexually hostile work environment and retaliatory hostile work environment.cc: Counsel (TLB)
|
|
Filing
71
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 6/4/2013 granting in part and denying in part 45 Motion for Summary Judgment; Defendants Autozone Stores, Inc., Autozone Development Corp., Autozone Texas, L.P., and Autozone, Inc. are DISMISSED; motion for summary judgment as to any claims concerning Autozones issuance of the July 2010 Corrective ActionReviews against Quiney and Harper, alleged negative employment reference of Harper, and Autozones failure to promote Quiney and Ha rper is SUSTAINED, and these claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiffs racial discrimination claim based on Plaintiffs terminations isDENIED; motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiffs other racial discrimination claims and Plaintiffs claims for retaliation is SUSTAINED and those claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.cc:counsel (TLB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
