Ortega v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") et al
| Richard Ortega |
| Unknown Corrections Officers in the Employ of Louisville/Jefferson Metro Corrections, Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, Mark Bolton, John Morton, Richard A. Wong, Unknown Agents and Employees in the Employ of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") |
| 3:2011cv00429 |
| August 3, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Jefferson |
| John G. Heyburn |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 11/16/12 sustaining Metro Defendants 40 Motion to Dismiss; and sustaining Federal Defendants 42 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. cc:counsel (DAK)
|
|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 4/27/12 granting in part and denying in part 17 Motion to Dismiss; Motion to Dismiss is SUSTAINED in part and Defendants John Morton, Richard Wong, and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement are DISMISSED from this action; Motion to Dismiss is DENIED in part and the Unknown Agents and Employees in the Employ of ICE remain as defendants. The Court will set a conference with the parties in the near future. cc:counsel (DAK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
