Harvell v. Ervin et al
| Anthony Harvell |
| Terris L. Ervin, Blair Logistics, LLC and Sentry Casualty Company |
| 3:2011cv00525 |
| September 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Jefferson |
| Dave Whalin |
| Charles R. Simpson |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 11/5/12; re 72 Second MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Sherry Patterson, 65 Third MOTION to Amend/Correct 53 Amended Complaint filed by Anthony Harvell. A separate order will be entered this date in accordance with this opinion cc:counsel (SJS)
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 8/2/2012; re 62 Third Party MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Sherry Patterson; a separate order will be entered in accordance with this opinion. cc:counsel (TLB)
|
|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 1/26/2012. 8 motion to bifurcate the trial of the plaintiffs negligence claims from the third-party bad faith claim is GRANTED and the bad faith claim is STAYED. Discovery on the bad faith claim against Sentry Select Insurance Company is STAYED PENDING RESOLUTION OF THE NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS AGAINST TERRIS L. ERVIN AND BLAIR LOGISTICS, LLC.cc:counsel (TLB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
