Lillard v. University of Louisville
| James W. Lillard, Jr. |
| University of Louisville |
| 3:2011cv00554 |
| October 4, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| John G. Heyburn |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
158
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay. For reasons set forth, Motion to Amend (DN 154 ) is denied. Telephonic Status Conference set for 1/11/2016 11:00 AM EST before Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay. Counsel to email direct dial telephone number to Case Manager as set forth. cc: Counsel(JAC)
|
|
Filing
153
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay on 6/2/2015 re 147 Motion to Modify - Parties are to comply as set forth herewith. cc: Counsel(DAK)
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 11/20/2012; 35 Motion to Alter, Amend, or Vacate Court' previous order is SUSTAINED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; The following claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for state cour t resolution: Count III Breach of Contract; Count V Violation of University Policies and Procedures; and Count XI Due Process, as it relates to Kentucky constitutional and statutory laws; The following claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: Count II Fraud, Deceit, Misrepresentation, and Fraudulent Inducement; Count IV Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; Count VI Intentional or Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress; Count VII Interference with Contractual Relation s; Count X Defamation; Count XI Due Process, relating to the Fourteenth Amendment; and Count XII Malicious Prosecution, Abuse of Process, and Wrongful Use of Civil Proceedings; The following claims remain before this Court: Count I Discrimination and Hostile Work Environment; Count VIII Retaliatory Discharge; Count IX Retaliation; Count XIII Public Policy Retaliation; and Count XIV Ongoing Discrimination and Retaliation.cc: Counsel (TBS)
|
|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 11/15/12 sustaining 30 Motion to Amend/Correct 1 Complaint. cc:counsel (DAK)
|
|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 7/17/12 granting in part and denying in part 7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Defendants Motion to Dismiss is SUSTAINED IN PART and Counts II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, X, XI, and XII are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Defendants Motion to Dismiss is DENIED IN PART and Count XIII remains. cc:counsel (DAK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lillard v. University of Louisville | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James W. Lillard, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | James M. Morris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: University of Louisville | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
