Powell v. Cornett
Plaintiff: Natasha Jo Powell
Defendant: Fred Cornett
Case Number: 3:2011cv00628
Filed: November 9, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Louisville Office
County: Marion
Presiding Judge: John G. Heyburn
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 4/18/2013 ; 11 Motion for Summary Judgment is SUSTAINED and plaintiff's claims for false arrest, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution and outrage are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; this is a final and appealable order. cc:counsel (TLB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Powell v. Cornett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Natasha Jo Powell
Represented By: Joseph R. Stewart
Represented By: Theodore H. Lavit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fred Cornett
Represented By: Roger G. Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?