Theresa Dunn et al v. Procarent, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Kentucky Western District Theresa Dunn et al v. Procarent, Inc.

Theresa Dunn et al v. Procarent, Inc.

Case Number:	3:2011cv00704
Filed:	July 20, 2022
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office:	Louisville Office
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutes: False Claims Act
Cause of Action:	31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 7, 2024	Filing 124 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 3/7/24 ; granting in part and denying in part 119 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Defendant Procarent, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Third Amend ed Complaint, [R. 119 ], is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. a. The motion is GRANTED to the extent Procarent seeks dismissal of Count I. Count I is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. b. The motion is GRANTED to the extent Procarent seeks dismissal of Count II's fraudulent certification theory. Count II is DISMISSED IN PART, WITH PREJUDICE. c. The motion is DENIED in all other respects. cc: Counsel(DJT)
July 20, 2022	Filing 110 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 7/20/22; granting in part and denying in part 92 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim: Said motion is GRANTED to the extent it seeks dismissal of Count I and Count II for failure to satisfy Rule 9(b)'s pleading standard. Counts I and II are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Said motion is DENIED in all other respects. The Relators SHALL file a Third Amended Complaint within sixty (60) days of the entry of this Memorandum Opinion and Order. cc: Counsel (DJT)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 7, 2024

Filing 124 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 3/7/24 ; granting in part and denying in part 119 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Defendant Procarent, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Third Amend ed Complaint, [R. 119 ], is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. a. The motion is GRANTED to the extent Procarent seeks dismissal of Count I. Count I is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. b. The motion is GRANTED to the extent Procarent seeks dismissal of Count II's fraudulent certification theory. Count II is DISMISSED IN PART, WITH PREJUDICE. c. The motion is DENIED in all other respects. cc: Counsel(DJT)

July 20, 2022

Filing 110 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 7/20/22; granting in part and denying in part 92 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim: Said motion is GRANTED to the extent it seeks dismissal of Count I and Count II for failure to satisfy Rule 9(b)'s pleading standard. Counts I and II are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Said motion is DENIED in all other respects. The Relators SHALL file a Third Amended Complaint within sixty (60) days of the entry of this Memorandum Opinion and Order. cc: Counsel (DJT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Theresa Dunn et al v. Procarent, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?