Harper v. W.W. Grainger, Inc.

Harper v. W.W. Grainger, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Larry Harper
Defendant:	W.W. Grainger, Inc.
Case Number:	3:2012cv00097
Filed:	February 21, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office:	Louisville Office
County:	Jefferson
Presiding Judge:	James D. Moyer
Presiding Judge:	Charles R. Simpson
Nature of Suit:	Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 3, 2014	Filing 84 MEMORANDUM OPINION by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 6/2/2014; re 59 MOTION to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, 73 MOTION to supplement response ; a seperate order will be entered in accordance with this opinion. cc:counsel (TLB)
June 7, 2013	Filing 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 6/6/2013; 47 motion for oral argument regarding pending motions is DENIED; [DN 44] motion to supplement the record is GRANTED; 38 motion for default judgment is DENIED to th e extent that it seeks a default judgment and GRANTED to the extent that it seeks an order allowing Larry Harper to serve Li & Fung through its counsel; Plaintiff Larry Harper may serve Defendant Li & Fung (Trading) Ltd. by serving Li & Fung (Trading ) Ltd.s counsel in Kentucky; and 36 motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and insufficient service of process is DENIED insofar as it requests that the action be dismissed for insufficient service of process and is DENIED AS NOT YET RIPE insofar as it contends that personal jurisdiction over Li & Fung (Trading) Ltd. is lacking. cc:counsel (TLB)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 3, 2014

Filing 84 MEMORANDUM OPINION by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 6/2/2014; re 59 MOTION to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, 73 MOTION to supplement response ; a seperate order will be entered in accordance with this opinion. cc:counsel (TLB)

June 7, 2013

Filing 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 6/6/2013; 47 motion for oral argument regarding pending motions is DENIED; [DN 44] motion to supplement the record is GRANTED; 38 motion for default judgment is DENIED to th e extent that it seeks a default judgment and GRANTED to the extent that it seeks an order allowing Larry Harper to serve Li & Fung through its counsel; Plaintiff Larry Harper may serve Defendant Li & Fung (Trading) Ltd. by serving Li & Fung (Trading ) Ltd.s counsel in Kentucky; and 36 motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and insufficient service of process is DENIED insofar as it requests that the action be dismissed for insufficient service of process and is DENIED AS NOT YET RIPE insofar as it contends that personal jurisdiction over Li & Fung (Trading) Ltd. is lacking. cc:counsel (TLB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harper v. W.W. Grainger, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: W.W. Grainger, Inc.
Represented By:	Sarah G. Cronan
Represented By:	John Lewis Tate
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Larry Harper
Represented By:	Timothy R. McCarthy
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?