Riggs v. Haney
Plaintiff: Larry Ray Riggs
Defendant: Steve Haney
Case Number: 3:2012cv00461
Filed: August 2, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Louisville Office
County: Larue
Presiding Judge: John G. Heyburn
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 11/8/12. The Ct is satisfied in the instant case that no jurists of reason could find its ruling to be debatable. A certificate of appealability must, there, be denied. The Ct will enter an order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion.cc:counsel, Pro Se Petitioner, Attorney General (SJS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Riggs v. Haney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steve Haney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Larry Ray Riggs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?