Tomaskovic v. River City Glass, Inc
John Tomaskovic |
River City Glass, Inc |
3:2012cv00681 |
October 17, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Louisville Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Thomas B. Russell |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 108 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 5/292014 - 40 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. cc:counsel (DAK) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tomaskovic v. River City Glass, Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: John Tomaskovic | |
Represented By: | Brian D. Cook |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: River City Glass, Inc | |
Represented By: | Aaron J. Silletto |
Represented By: | Charles H. Cassis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.