United States of America v. Commonwealth Technologies, LLC(XXXXX5480) et al

Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Commonwealth Technologies, LLC(XXXXX5480) and Lusk Mechanical Contractors, Inc. (#xxxxx5711 and #xxxxx4190)
Case Number: 3:2012cv00817
Filed: December 6, 2012
Court: Kentucky Western District Court
Office: Louisville Office
County: Hardin
Presiding Judge: Charles R. Simpson
Nature of Suit: Forfeit/Penalty: Other
Cause of Action: 21:881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Commonwealth Technologies, LLC(XXXXX5480) et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Amy M. Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commonwealth Technologies, LLC(XXXXX5480)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lusk Mechanical Contractors, Inc. (#xxxxx5711 and #xxxxx4190)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.