Hogan v. Jacobson et al
| Violet M. Hogan |
| Jo Ellen Jacobson and Kem Alan Lockhart |
| 3:2012cv00820 |
| December 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Jefferson |
| James D. Moyer |
| Charles R. Simpson |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale. Hogan's complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and defects in complaint cannot be remedied by further amendment. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (DN 46 ) is granted. Action is dismissed with prejudice and stricken from Court's docket. cc: Counsel (JAC)
|
|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 3/11/2014. The motion of Violet Hogan for reconsideration (DN 26 ) will be denied. The motion of Jo Ellen Jacobson and Kem Alan Lockhart for sanctions (DN 10 ) is remanded with leave to reinstate pending adjudication on the merits of Hogan's claims. A separate order will be entered this date in accordance with this Memorandum Opinion. cc: Counsel (TJD)
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 9/25/13; The motion 8 of Violet Hogan to remand will be denied. A separate order will be entered herein this date in accordance with this opinion. cc:counsel (DJT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
