Blaine v. Louisville Metro Government et al
| Daniella Blaine |
| Louisville Metro Government, Steve Conrad, Tinnell, McNamara, Corizon, Inc., S. Kohl, A.O. Daugherty, T. Sloan, Mark E. Bolton and John and Jane Does 1-10 |
| 3:2013cv00427 |
| April 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Jefferson |
| Charles R. Simpson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Signed by Judge David J. Hale on 2/15/2018 granting 97 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 101 Motion for Summary Judgment; a separate judgment shall issue. cc: Counsel(KJA)
|
|
Filing
65
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale. Plaintiff's Objections to Order of Magistrate Judge denying motion to compel (DN 50 ) are sustained. Clerk directed to reinstate defendants Bolton and Conrad. Bolton and Conrad to respond to discovery requests within 30 days. Within 14 days, Blaine to file motion voluntarily dismissing claim against Conrad. cc: counsel (JAC)
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 1/28/2014; The Court will grant Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs § 1983 claims against Defendants Conrad and Bolton. A separate order will be entered in accordance with this opinion. cc:counsel (JBM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
